Showing posts with label Best Picture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Best Picture. Show all posts

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Spotlight (2015) Review

Directed by
Thomas McCarthy

 

Of its many remarkable qualities, perhaps the most impressive aspect of Thomas McCarthy’s Spotlight is its singular persistence of vision.  This is a movie that attempts to juggle so many stories, characters and events (the majority of which either occur offscreen or are apocryphal to begin with) that in the hands of a lesser filmmaker, the result could have easily been a scrambled mess.  Because the movie depicts the unfolding of the Catholic clergy abuse scandal, it could have easily gravitated toward exploitation or melodrama.  Because the movie also depicts the workaday lives of reporters spending every moment of their spare time devoted to uncovering the facts of the case, the film could have become a character study of the obsessive personalities of journalists.
            
But Spotlight is none of those things.  We do not get the obligatory scenes of a predatory priest inviting a young boy into the back of a giant foreboding Buick, nor do we get the same tired scene of the reporter’s wife crying, throwing a glass on the floor, and shouting no honey, you don’t pay enough attention to me or your family any more.  This is a film where the majority of the action occurs in a small backroom office of the Boston Globe, where the characters don’t talk about Ethics and The American Way, but instead pour through old directories for lists of names and copy them hurriedly on to Excel spreadsheets.  The action which does occur outside the office only relates to the process of the ongoing investigation, meaning that like the reporters, we become familiar with the lecherous priests through name and secondhand description only.  Like many great films, it is tough on its audience.  We don’t get the luxury of flashbacks or subtitles, reinforcing just how vast and expansive the cover-up truly was.
            
Another unique aspect of Spotlight is that it lacks a true protagonist.  As the film opens in summer of 2001, we are introduced to the titular four-member investigative reporting team at the Globe, led by Walter ‘Robby’ Robinson (Michael Keaton).  The Globe’s new managing editor is an outsider named Marty Baron (Liev Shreiber) whose first directive to the Spotlight crew is to reexamine allegations of sexual abuse in the church that has been peripherally covered by the paper in the last couple of decades.  Baron’s outsider status is significant because, as we soon learn, native Bostonians have (unwittingly or purposefully) become immune and desensitized to individual claims of clergy abuse.  The city’s populace, as well as the Spotlight team, believe that any scandal that exists is confined to a few bad seeds and little more.

            
But soon, the reporters begin identifying troubling trends.  All of the legal suits against the Catholic Church were settled out-of-court by sleek attorneys such as Eric Macleish (a creepily smug Billy Crudup), with the church conveniently evading criminal penalties and public relations nightmares.  The few victims they are able to track down are unwilling to speak out for fear of retribution or humiliation.  Most disturbing of all, the team finds increasing evidence that pedophilic priests are not statistical outliers, but a symptomatic and systemic problem that the church is acutely aware of.  Worse yet, rather than combat the problem, the church uses its considerable leverage to limit public knowledge of the details of such cases.
            
The reporters on the Spotlight team are played by Mark Ruffalo, Rachel McAdams and Brian d’Arcy James.  Along with Keaton, the reporters must deal with resistance not only from the church, but from legal, political and even journalistic systems that appear entirely aligned to the corrupt aims of the church.  One of Spotlight’s best exchanges occurs between the reporters and Baron, who is at first reluctant to publish their early interviews with abuse survivors.  The reporters seemed agitated at first, but Baron’s logic is sound – to limit coverage to the individual cases only reinforces the church’s desired narrative, which is that abuse is an abnormality rather than a norm.  To truly expose the perverse depths of the scandal, the Spotlight team must expose how the pernicious institutional structure of the Catholic clergy permits such abuse to continue.  This goes beyond assembling victim testimonies – challenging in its own right – and accessing secret church documentation kept under lock and key.
            
It is here that a lesser film would have constructed the pursuit of this secret information as the story’s prototypical MacGuffin – the mythical source of all narrative motivation, discovery and catharsis.  But the screenplay, by director McCarthy and Josh Singer, is refreshing in the way that the uncovering of the documents provides only one relatively small facet of the larger story.  Keaton’s character, for example, undergoes a fascinating moral development throughout the course of the film.  At first, Robinson is depicted as a successful editor at the Globe with deep loyalties to Boston, as well as someone with friends in powerful professional circles who also happen to be ardent defenders of the church.  By the end of the film, however, Robinson has severed his loyalties and friendships through his undeterred affiliation with Spotlight’s investigation.  The film does a good job of illustrating how Robinson’s shift illustrates the rift between the personal and professional allegiances of journalists.  This is wisely shown through understated subtlety rather than over-the-top histrionics.

            
Ruffalo's and McAdams’ characters are fascinating too (so is a wary lawyer for the abuse victims played by Stanley Tucci) but watching Spotlight, I found myself most interested by Schreiber’s character, Marty Baron, the new editor.  He probably has less screen time than any of the other main characters, but in many respects, he is the film’s most enigmatic and complex.  What are his true motivations behind reigniting the Globe’s investigation?  They certainly are not based on personal retributions (he is a Jew from Miami), and one character speculates they may be based on the desire for upward mobility in the newspaper industry.  Schreiber’s performance is so muted, controlled and mannered (he doesn’t even follow baseball, he solemnly tells Keaton) that he is almost impossible to read, yet in his clear discomfort in social situations, he is compulsively watchable.  It is a fascinating and complex performance which, like Keaton’s and Ruffalo’s, unquestionably deserves serious Academy Award consideration.

The events of Spotlight take place over a six month period between 2001 and 2002 (the events of 9/11 make an ominous cameo appearance) and yet it still seems as though public awareness of sex abuse in the Catholic church has only scratched the surface.  At one point in the film, an expert estimates that six percent of all clergy have committed some form of sexual abuse against a minor.  If we are to believe that claim, along with the film’s broader conclusion that the cover-up was sanctioned and institutionalized rather than discrete and extraordinary, then why should we believe that this problem has gone away?  Certainly, the Catholic church’s position has become far more evolved and conciliatory in the 13 years since the events of Spotlight.  Pope Francis enjoys greater popularity among nonadherents than any recent Pope before him.  But as McCarthy’s film shows, the sinful acts of individuals are usually the byproduct of calculation and politicking on the part of the large institutions that protect them.  Or as Tucci’s worn-down lawyer sagely explains, “If it takes a village to raise a child, it also takes a village to abuse one.”

                           

Rating: 4 stars

Thursday, July 9, 2015

2010's Mid-Decade Report: Oscar-less Best Picture Nominees

One of the more interesting aspects of the first half of this decade is the changing policies around the Oscars and their Best Picture lineups.  In 2008, there was such controversy surrounding the 5 Best Picture nominees that the Academy decided to change its nominating policies.  Instead of the traditional 5 nominees, there would be 10 in order to honor some of the more mainstream movies in the ceremony.  What the Academy quickly realized is not every year has 10 films worthy of being nominated.  (I am still wondering how The Blind Side is called a Best Picture nominee.)  After that failed experiment, they changed the rules again to make it a lineup of 5-10 movies based on how many were deserving that particular year (earning at least 5% of the first place votes).  We have been under these rules since 2011, which has given us years of nine nominees and one year (this last one) of only eight.  Either way, this decade has brought us more Best Picture nominees than we have had since the first few years of the award's existence.

So how successful has the Academy been?  These rule changes were put in place after 2008 to avoid critically-acclaimed blockbusters like WALL-E and The Dark Knight that are truly deserving to be left out of the Best Picture picture.  Has it been successful?  Well, in the 2000's there were 55 films nominated for Best Picture with 11 of them coming home without winning a single Oscar (four of those films coming from the embarrassment that was the 2009 lineup, the first top ten).  So far this decade, there have been 45 films nominated for Best Picture.  Of those, 14 of them did not win a single Oscar, raising the winless rate 11% from the previous decade.  If a film isn't best at anything, does it deserve film's highest honor?  Let's look at these 14 films and see if their resume truly deserves the title "Best Picture Nominee."


Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
(2011)
2 nominations
Picture
Supporting Actor - Max von Sydow

This has got to be one of the strangest Best Picture nominees in some time.  It's only other nomination was a Supporting Actor nod that had no precursors outside of a couple random critic groups.  The film was completely shut out at the Golden Globes which normally likes heartfelt films with starpower like Tom Hanks and Sandra Bullock.  Add to that a film like The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo was left off that year's list while taking home an important win like Best Editing.  It was a quality film that I enjoyed, but it didn't seem to fit the honor.
Nomination Grade: F


The Tree of Life
(2011)
3 nominations
Picture
Director - Terrence Malick
Cinematography

There are artistic films, and then there are Terrence Malick films.  He doesn't make many movies, but this was only his second film nominated for Best Picture.  Every now and then these art films get nominated for the big prize, and its other nominations show how much respect the Academy had for its filmmaking.  However, there is no way this film gets into a five film lineup for Best Picture.  If the purpose of expanding the Best Picture lineup was to allow more mass-appealing films into the Best Picture lineup, why does a Terrence Malick film get one of the expanded spots?  That is about as opposite of "mass-appealing" as possible.
Nomination Grade: D


Philomena
(2013)
4 nominations
Picture
Actress - Judi Dench
Adapted Screenplay
Original Score

Every year, no matter how many films are nominated, there seems to be the stereotypical British film that works its way into the Best Picture lineup for some reason.  In 2013, that film was Philomena.  It had about every nomination one of these British films needs to justify its Best Picture appearance.  It had a major acting nomination, a screenplay nom, and one other random justification nod.  The only thing that would have made its case stronger would have been a Directing nomination.  Looking at the 2013 lineup, it would have been interesting to see if it would have made a five film lineup.  There are other films that were more worthy, but it is the type of film that sneaks in no matter what.  On top of that, it was a great film.  I have no problem with this film being a Best Picture nominee.
Nomination Grade: B-


Beasts of the Southern Wild
(2012)
4 nominations
Picture
Actress - Quvenzhane Wallis
Director - Benh Zeitlin
Adapted Screenplay

Another byproduct of expanding the Best Picture is bringing attention some small independent films that usually wouldn't be recognized as much.  Beasts of the Southern Wild is one of those films.  A film like this sometimes pops up in the screenplay lists.  However, it is rare a small independent film finds its way to screenplay, director, and acting nominations.  Maybe it got this much attention because it did have a chance at Best Picture so people paid more attention to it.  Maybe it really was that good in the eyes of the Academy.  I don't think it was that deserving of the honor, but it is hard to argue much with the resume it put together.
Nomination Grade: C+


Winter's Bone
(2010)
4 nominations
Picture
Actress - Jennifer Lawrence
Supporting Actor - John Hawkes
Adapted Screenplay

This film falls in a similar category as Beasts of the Southern Wild.  It deserved awards attention, but probably didn't deserve a Best Picture nomination.  As the one year that was forced to have 10 nominees this decade, I have to think Winter's Bone was the tenth film on the list.  If it hadn't been for a very surprising nomination for John Hawkes, it would not have had much of a resume to warrant Best Picture consideration.  However, many people forget that this was the film that announced the arrival of Jennifer Lawrence.  If it weren't for Winter's Bone, I don't know if she would be as much of a household name now.
Nomination Grade: C-


The Kids Are All Right
(2010)
4 nominations
Picture
Actress - Annette Bening
Supporting Actor - Mark Ruffalo
Original Screenplay

This is an actor's film.  Many times in films like this, there are not many nominations outside the major categories.  This is the case with this film as it only garnered two acting nominations and a screenplay nomination.  Julianne Moore could have easily been nominated as well, but wasn't.  Usually you would think a film like this deserves its Best Picture nomination, but it reminds me a little of a film like Doubt which earned four acting nominations and a screenplay nomination, but was left off the Best Picture top five of 2008.  However, Doubt deserved consideration for one of those spots just as much as fan favorites WALL-E and The Dark Knight did.  I have no problem seeing this film in the Best Picture category.
Nomination Grade: B


The Wolf of Wall Street
(2013)
5 nominations
Picture
Actor - Leonardo DiCaprio
Supporting Actor - Jonah Hill
Director - Martin Scorsese
Adapted Screenplay

Some filmmakers deserve the recognition of Best Picture for pretty much every film they put out.  This was Martin Scorsese's 8th film to be nominated for Best Picture, and it seems to have a very similar pedigree as some of his earlier films.  With that said, it would not have been a huge shock to see Leo DiCaprio walk away with Best Actor this time around (other than the fact that the Academy seems physically unable to give Leo his day in the sun).  It may only have five nominations, but they are all the important ones.  This was definitely a lock for Best Picture that year.
Nomination Grade: A-


Captain Phillips
(2013)
6 nominations
Picture
Supporting Actor - Barkhad Abdi
Adapted Screenplay
Sound Mixing
Editing
Sound Editing

It is a shame this film didn't have a 7th nomination as Tom Hanks was robbed in the Best Actor category.  With that said, looking back on it, this was a somewhat strange nomination.  It only had one acting nomination (for a film debut no less).  It had a screenplay nomination, but no directing recognition hurts it.  It had several tech noms, but Paul Greengrass always gets those noms whether his movie gets major recognition or not (see United 93 and The Bourne Ultimatum).  In a year with five nominees, this may have been left off the list.  However, as a fan of this film, I am happy I can call it a nominee.
Nomination Grade: B


Nebraska
(2013)
6 nominations
Picture
Actor - Bruce Dern
Supporting Actress - June Squibb
Director - Alexander Payne
Original Screenplay
Cinematography

This has everything you would expect to see out of a Best Picture nominee.  It has some solid acting nominations (with Bruce Dern in talks of winning to the very end), a previous winner nominated for director, the screenplay is nominated, and it got a solid tech nomination as well.  This film deserves its moniker.  It was just one of the unlucky films that couldn't beat anybody out.
Nomination Grade: A


War Horse
(2011)
6 nominations
Picture
Cinematography
Art Direction
Sound
Sound Editing
Original Score

There is a big difference between War Horse and Nebraska even though they had the same number of nominations.  While Nebraska had all the important nominations like acting, director, and screenplay, War Horse was only able to be recognized for its tech performances.  The only reason this was even considered a Best Picture contender is the fact that it was directed by Steven Spielberg.  In a year with five nominees, this would be the equivalent of films like King Kong or Memoirs of a Geisha, however those films actually won Oscars while not being nominated.  This probably didn't belong here.
Nomination Grade: C


Moneyball
(2011)
6 nominations
Picture
Actor - Brad Pitt
Supporting Actor - Jonah Hill
Adapted Screenplay
Sound
Editing

If my brother has convinced me of anything in regards to the Oscars, it is that under most circumstances, a nomination for Best Editing is an indication of a movie loved by the Academy.  Add that to two acting nominations, a screenplay nomination, and a film fronted by a previous directing nominee, and you have quite a strong resume for Best Picture.  This film definitely deserves its title, even if it is about the Oakland A's...
Nomination Grade: A-


127 Hours
(2010)
6 nominations
Picture
Actor - James Franco
Adapted Screenplay
Editing
Original Song
Original Score

I can't think of this film's run at the Oscars without thinking of the bizarre behavior of James Franco while hosting the Oscars that year.  For that performance alone, I wish this film hadn't gotten so much recognition.  As it is, as much as I love this movie, it didn't really earn its way to being a Best Picture nominee.  It did have some key nominations like actor, screenplay, and editing, and it also was the follow-up film for a recent winner, but its other two nominations were for music.  Those are categories where many films get their one and only nominations.  As it was, they were more honoring another recent winner in A.R. Rahman than honoring the film.  This fits in a similar category as Cast Away.  Franco deserved his nomination (despite the Oscars), and the film deserved some recognition, but not Hollywood's highest honor.
Nomination Grade: C


American Hustle
(2013)
10 nominations
Picture
Actor - Christian Bale
Actress - Amy Adams
Supporting Actor - Bradley Cooper
Supporting Actress - Jennifer Lawrence
Director - David O. Russell
Original Screenplay
Production Design
Costume Design
Editing

Of all the films on this list, American Hustle deserves to be here.  Its 10 nominations are tied for second most of all time for a film to get shut out.  It achieved a true rarity by getting nominated in every major category (Picture, Director, Screenplay, and all 4 acting categories).  The ironic thing is it was the second year in a row David O. Russell pulled off this feat.  It is also amazing how close this movie was to not being on this list.  Jennifer Lawrence was an Oscar favorite through much of the awards season, and it would not have been a surprise if the film walked away with the Best Picture honor.  Instead, it walked away with nothing, but it definitely deserves to be called a Best Picture nominee.
Nomination Grade: A+


True Grit
(2010)
10 nominations
Picture
Actor - Jeff Bridges
Supporting Actress - Hailee Steinfeld
Director - The Coen Brothers
Adapted Screenplay
Cinematography
Art Direction
Costume Design
Sound
Sound Editing

This is one of the films American Hustle is tied with.  The Coens are almost guaranteed to get some serious recognition whenever they put out a movie, even if it is a remake of a beloved classic John Wayne western.  Although this one wasn't as deserving as American Hustle (no editing nom, not as many acting noms), it still belongs in the Best Picture discussion.  You have the recent winner getting recognized again in Jeff Bridges, the directors of a recent Best Picture winner getting honored again for producing, directing, and writing, and you have the fact that the Academy loves westerns.  Everything about this film screams award worthy, except for the fact that it didn't win any.
Nomination Grade: A


After looking at all these films, let's ask the question again.  Has it worked?  I think they have succeeded in drawing the public's attention to more quality films that the masses otherwise would not have heard of.  There have been very few instances where the big blockbusters have garnered extra recognition by being nominated.  I think this is partially because very few of the big blockbusters this decade have been high quality enough to be recognized in this way.  I think the recent rules for Best Picture are much better for honoring the movies that deserve it.  If you noticed, there were no 2014 films on this list as all 2014 Best Picture nominees walked away with at least one Oscar.  Rumors are beginning to swirl that the Academy is considering changing their rules for Best Picture once again.  Although I did like the group of five every year, I also appreciate the need to expand with the ever-expanding industry.  The current rules ensure no more films like The Blind Side end up as an Best Picture nominee (although Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close made it under the current rules).  I would like to see the rules stay the same.  However, it will be interesting to see what we talk about when it comes to Best Picture nominees at the end of this decade.  Either way, these 14 films are now immortalized in exclusive company whether they deserve it or not.

Friday, February 28, 2014

2014 Oscar Challenge

There are only two days left to sign up for the AlmostSideways Oscar Challenge.  Ballots are due by midnight Pacific Time Sunday morning.  Click on Oscar to go to the ballots.


Note: Your e-mail address will only be used for direct communication concerning the AlmostSideways Oscar Challenge.

Friday, February 22, 2013

Oscar Breakdown and Handicapping: Best Picture



We finally get to the final and most important category. All conventional knowledge would have stated that after the nominations were announced Argo would not be in the running since it lacks the Best Director nomination. Now that it has gobbled up every award in its way, it seems like a shoo-in winner. But then there is the Weinstein push for Silver Linings Playbook. This could get interesting. Check out my final breakdown article of the season…

9. Django Unchained
Notable awards: none
Notable nominations: BFCA, Golden Globes (Drama), PGA
Case for the Oscar: It has a very nice box office. The fact that two straight Tarantino movies have made it into the Best Picture lineup may mean that the Academy is really beginning to accept his style of filmmaking. Until they truly takes him seriously as a director as opposed to just a screenwriter, then his films are going to continue to appeal to that niche market and not really have a shot at winning this award.
Oscar Doppelganger: 1996 Best Picture: Jerry Maguire. The movie was nominated despite missing out on the Best Director nomination. Seeing how his career had gone, the Academy never really took him seriously as a director, only as one of the more likable screenwriters of his time. The movie was somewhat of a box office phenomenon and the director’s highest grossing film, but nobody ever really thought it could win Best Picture.
Odds of winning: 250/1
8. Beasts of the Southern Wild
Notable awards: none
Notable nominations: BFCA, Spirit Awards, PGA
Case for the Oscar: The movie is getting all of the indie enthusiast votes. The major awards love proves that it has a great following, but it is just not a normal Oscar movie. If there had been five nominees, this would have been the strangest Best Director nominee without BP since Blue Velvet. The movie is one that inspires fondness as opposed to amazement, which hurts its chances at winning any awards (or gathering a significant audience, for that matter). The movie is destined to be an also-ran, but its nominations have already defied the odds.
Oscar Doppelganger: 2010 Best Picture: Winter’s Bone. The movie was the indie hit of the year that defied the odds and got invited to the ceremony in several categories. Its chances of winning were never really all that realistic, but being mentioned among the best of the year showed how much the Academy members appreciated its achievement with such a small budget.
Odds of winning: 150/1
7. Amour
Notable awards: Cannes, Los Angeles Critics, National Society of Film Critics
Notable nominations: none
Case for the Oscar: It is the most critically acclaimed movie of the year. There hasn’t been a foreign film in the Best Picture lineup since 2000, so this type of recognition is extremely rare. Everyone who has seen it has marveled over its emotional impact, so if it somehow got enough members to see it, then it actually could finish in the top few films. Winning is not going to happen, but Haneke has certainly put his name at the top of the list of most accessible foreign filmmakers with this superb little film.
Oscar Doppelganger: 1973 Best Picture: Cries and Whispers. The film had deep and depressing themes. The director was probably the most beloved foreign director of his time, and this was his most popular film with the awards circuits. The film was up against more popular Hollywood studio releases, so it never really had a shot at winning, but it certainly shook up the race, becoming one of only 9 foreign language films ever nominated for Best Picture.
Odds of winning: 100/1
6. Zero Dark Thirty
Notable awards: Boston Critics, Chicago Critics, National Board of Review, New York Critics
Notable nominations: BAFTA, Golden Globes (Drama), PGA
Case for the Oscar: For me, this is the best movie of the year. Its controversy is completely off-base, but that will be enough for the members to shy away from voting for the film. They are all about avoiding controversy. The director-writer combo just won all the major awards a few years ago, so that could either help the cause or prevent them from showering them with more awards this soon. Its Best Director snub is ridiculous, but that is pretty telling as to its chances in this category, since the film is clearly a directing spectacle.
Oscar Doppelganger: 1991 Best Picture: JFK. There was controversy the moment the film was announced. The Academy was probably not ready for the film, but they knew it was great and that the technical aspects were spectacular. The Best Picture nomination seemed like a formality for the Oscar-winning filmmakers, but its chances of actually taking Best Picture were very slim.
Odds of winning: 70/1
5. Les Miserables
Notable awards: Golden Globes (Comedy/Musical)
Notable nominations: BAFTA, BFCA, PGA, SAG
Case for the Oscar: The movie was the most Oscar-friendly on paper, but the film underwhelmed everyone but the most devoted Les Mis fans. The Academy snubbed it for Best Director, which showed that the film is not as popular as it could or should have been. It had a very nice box office, however, so if the Academy wants to give the award to a fluff winner, then this would likely be it. There has not been a musical to win this in a decade, so that may help its chances. They cannot resist them sometimes.
Oscar Doppelganger: 2001 Best Picture: Moulin Rouge!. The film was a visual and artistic spectacle, but the experience of watching it was quite frenetic and somewhat of a mess. The film certainly had its fans, but its style turned off enough voters to not have a chance at winning Best Picture.
Odds of winning: 60/1
4. Life of Pi
Notable awards: none
Notable nominations: BAFTA, BFCA, Golden Globes (Drama), PGA
Case for the Oscar: The movie feels the most like an Oscar winner. The material and visual style would certainly take the Oscar back to when these types of epic ambition films won the awards, but it faces the issue of not having any stars in the film. That hasn’t been an issue with Slumdog Millionaire and The Artist, but Life of Pi just didn’t have the widespread love or devoted fans of many of the other contenders. If the Academy wants to play it safe, then this will likely be the winner, which would be the first 3D release Best Picture winner.
Oscar Doppelganger: 2003 Best Picture: Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World. The movie was not the most popular film with the Academy members, but it was an easy choice to give the film several technical nominations and a Best Picture mention. The movie was a visual spectacle and a wondrous experience, but the other contenders were more popular with the public and had more clear Oscar ambitions.
Odds of winning: 50/1
3. Lincoln
Notable awards: none
Notable nominations: BAFTA, BFCA, Golden Globes (Drama), PGA, SAG
Case for the Oscar: When the movie was announced, it would have seemed as if this were the one to beat. It turned out to be extremely talky and perhaps a bit too sophisticated for the Academy. If it were a biopic, then this would have been a much more popular film awards-wise. Its nominations were predictable, but winning would be quite an achievement for a film based so much on dialogue. Those types of films don’t win Best Picture, but most of them are not directed by Spielberg or starring Daniel Day-Lewis.
Oscar Doppelganger: 1994 Best Picture: Quiz Show. (This is mainly because I didn’t want to use Good Night, and Good Luck again…) The dialogue-heavy and important film was a clear Oscar contender from the moment it was announced, but it became more and more clear that it was not the type of film that could actually win big at the Oscars. The film’s director had won before, which made it even clearer that it would be singled out as one of the year’s best. It was Oscar gold on paper, but its style caused it to come up just short.
Odds of winning: 20/1
2. Silver Linings Playbook
Notable awards: Satellite Awards
Notable nominations: BFCA, Golden Globes (Comedy/Musical), Spirit Awards, PGA, SAG
Case for the Oscar: The Weinstein Company are pushing it hard, putting everyone involved in the film on every talk show in the country. It is still making money at the box office, so it is fresh in the minds of the voters. It has the feel-good sob story about the David O. Russell’s son. If he wins, then this will take Best Picture. The mental illness subject matter is the stuff that Oscar loves. This smells like an upset, but Argo just has so much momentum. It will be a close call.
Oscar Doppelganger: 2010 Best Picture: The King’s Speech. The film vastly overachieved at the box office. Weinstein pushed it so hard that it eventually became a serious threat to the obvious frontrunner. It was a very safe choice for the Academy members, who did not want to award a film that was outside of their normal recipient style. It rode the wave of audience popularity all the way to the ceremony. When the film took Best Director, the race was basically over.
Odds of winning: 8/1
1. Argo
Notable awards: BAFTA, BFCA, Golden Globes (Drama), PGA, SAG
Notable nominations: none
Case for the Oscar: It has taken every important award this season. George Clooney is the main producer, so that brings another element to its frontrunner status. The movie is a very Hollywood/LA movie, just like Crash was when it won over the Academy late in the game. It is also a very American movie, which the Academy may need after 3 of the last 4 years giving this award to films like Slumdog, The Artist, and The King’s Speech. Everyone feels bad for Ben Affleck, so this award is the one way that they can award his extraordinary work on the film. Unless the Weinstein money impacts the voting, then this will be our winner.
Oscar Doppelganger: 1981 Best Picture: Chariots of Fire. There really is no film that can be compared to what Argo has gone through. With Chariots of Fire, there were other Oscar contenders on paper that underachieved throughout the awards season. This movie was never going to win Best Director, but its status as the Best Picture frontrunner over blockbuster films was pretty clear. It wasn’t the most popular film with audiences, but it was a solid and easy choice for the Academy, one that may not be one of their better choices, but one that was a breath of fresh air during a time when most of the other Best Picture winners were all very forgettable and typical.
Odds of winning: 1/10

Previous articles:

Thoughts? Comments? Predictions? If you haven’t already, turn in your votes for the OSCAR CHALLENGE!

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Zach's Top Ten Films of 2012


I disagree with Todd about 2012.  I think it was the best year in movies since (at least) 2009.  In fact, I can prove this: That year, Inglorious Basterds ranked 5 on my year-end list.  This year, Django Unchained did not even make my top ten list.  And yet, I would consider Django a slightly better film between the two (solid Tarantino, not amazing, but still undeniably entertaining).  It is also the first year in my life where, if given choice between going to a theater and staying at home watching a movie, I would stay at home.  Theater audiences are talking and texting at seeming record-highs.  And it’s not a “generational” thing, as the talking heads love to claim – it’s more often than not 40-50 year olds who can’t shut up.  One of these days, I’ll grow up and tell them what I think . . . or maybe I’ll just trust the opposite of my instinct. OK, I’ll stop being grumpy now.

Films seen: 53
Thumbs up percentage: 56.66%
Best Actor: Jack Black, Bernie
Best Actress: Jennifer Lawrence, The Hunger Games
Best Supporting Actor: Michael Pena, End of Watch
Best Supporting Actress: Cecile de France, The Kid With a Bike
Underrated Films: Prometheus, The Dictator
Overrated Films: Silver Linings Playbook, The Cabin in the Woods, The Avengers
If I was an Oscar voter: Zero Dark Thirty, Michael Haneke (I haven’t seen Amour but it would be cool if he won), Daniel Day-Lewis, Jessica Chastain, Tommy Lee Jones, Helen Hunt. I think the Oscar nominations this year absolutely suck.
Worst Films of 2012: I’ll write this in an article about this later this week.  They deserve to be criticized at length.
Honorable Mention: Django Unchained, The Grey, A Late Quartet, Lincoln, Magic Mike



10. Compliance (Craig Zobel) Let me explain this pick.  First of all, I would not recommend you see this movie.  It is absolutely unbearable to watch.  Like Funny Games, it is not so much a movie or conventional story, but an experiment in illustrating human depravity manifested in its must vulgar forms.  The story (based on real-life events) takes place at a McDonalds restaurant, where a prank caller posing as a police detective orders one of the young female employees to strip, while various men are escorted in to “watch over” her.  It is neither entertaining nor sensational nor even particularly insightful.  It simply portrays the events as they surely must have happened, and it is horrifying.  It is like the 15-minute rape sequence in Irreversible stretched out to 85 minutes.  Some objected to the film’s sympathy for its characters’ unbelievably stupid actions, but the film effectively makes audiences question how blind compliance leads to unforgivable consequences.  The jury may be out on whether this is a “good” film or not, but few films have ever gotten deeper under my skin. 



9. Arbitrage (Nicholas Jarecki) When this film came out in September, most of the publicity it received was a result of its simultaneous DVD-theater-on demand release (“day-and-date” release).  But refreshingly, it actually turned out to be an outstanding film, starring Richard Gere (in maybe his best performance ever) as a hedge fund magnate who is caught in two serious, coinciding crises: The buyout of his firm, which has been guilty of accounting fraud for years, and the death of his mistress, for which he is squarely responsible.  The ways in which he is able to constantly get himself out of the walls caving in around him is amazing, and really makes you wonder whether the movie is just showing the powerful connections of Wall Street elite or, in a strange morbid way, romanticizing the craftiness of corrupt officials like Bernie Madoff (which Gere’s character appears at least partially inspired by).  Like last year’s brilliant Margin Call, this is a film rich with details about not just the downfall of Wall Street after the 2008 meltdown, but about the people most responsible (and subsequently affected) by the crash.  This is made all the more impressive by the fact that is the first feature screenplay and film by the 33-year-old director.


                                                         
8. Looper (Rian Johnson)  Think Minority Report-meets-The Terminator with a little bit of Inception on the side.  It’s not just that the story is ingenious, involving elements of time-travel, black market crime syndicates, and vigilante terrorism, but that the particular dramatic situations cannot possibly be described without an intricate knowledge of the sophisticated world the movie creates.  The screenplay is ingenious in its construction of this dystopian future, but also its creation of interesting characters and wonderfully unique encounters (such as when Joseph Gordon-Levitt converses with Bruce Willis, the future version of himself, over a cup of coffee).  Where it lacks Minority Report’s jaw-dropping visual palette, it makes up for in a surprising degree of intimacy, particularly with the characters of Gordon-Levitt and Emily Blunt, who are left with the unenviable task of (yes, just go with me here) deciding how the fate of the world will be impacted through their actions.  And believe it or not, there is not a second of it which is corny.



7. End of Watch (David Ayer)  Technically it is a buddy cop film, but honestly, it is much deeper than that.  Not unlike The Hurt Locker, Ayer’s film explores the undercurrents of men who seek out dangerous situations for a living.  They do it not necessarily because they feel a larger duty to improve the world, but also because they are addicted to the thrill of it.  To them, there is no other worthwhile existence.  Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Pena play the two LAPD cops at the center of the story, who monitor the streets of South Central Los Angeles. The film charts roughly a year in their lives, as they go through various marriages and childbirths in the midst of ongoing drug busts and homicide investigations.  The film is exciting, funny, cynical, tense, and most of all, real.  These feel like extremely real people, which is the result of a unique handheld visual aesthetic, career-best performances by Gyllenhaal and Pena, and a story which at first seems familiar, but delves into quite unexpected terrain at times. 



6. The Queen of Versailles (Lauren Greenfield)  Let me describe this film for you (and hopefully you’re looking at the picture I’ve provided).  This is a documentary about Jaqueline “Jackie” Siegel, a bleached-blonde former model with an impressive boob job.  She is married to David Siegel, 30 years her senior and head of the world’s most profitable time-share corporation.  They are billionaires.  When the film opens in 2008, they are in the process of constructing the world’s most expensive private home (which they dub “Versailles,” pronouncing the “s”).  The first half-hour feels like a Real Wives-esque exploration into the absurd lives of the rich and famous.  But as this film goes along, it turns into something very different: a portrait of aristocratic people struggling to retain not only their economic status, but their dignity.  It does a tremendous job of showing (but not convincing) audiences why anyone ever voted for Mitt Romney.  And maybe the most amazing thing about it is that, in a strange way, the Siegels come off as . . . kind of likable.  Particularly Jackie, who is less bubbly and vapid as she is insightful, candid, and self-deprecating.  And I hate rich people.  I watched this film curious and bored late on a Saturday night.  I have been thinking about it ever since.



5. Bernie (Richard Linklater)  There was no funnier movie in 2012 than Bernie, and there was no performance as dynamic, hilarious, and surprisingly deep as Jack Black.  He plays an East Texas assistant funeral home director who befriends an elderly widow who everyone in town hates.  From there, the story turns into a dark comedy of manners by way of Texas stereotypes (always good fodder for Christopher Guest-inspired mockumentaries like this one).  This is the first collaboration of Black and Richard Linklater since their wonderful School of Rock in 2003, and like that film, Bernie features great music, hilarious one-liners, and a story which at first sounds contrived, but when put in the right hands, is completely unique and fascinating.  Also – the scene introducing the juror members in San Augustine may be the funniest scene I’ve ever seen in a movie.  I’m not being hyperbolic.  When I saw it, I went into compulsive, uncontrollable laugher and missed the next five minutes of the film attempting to be polite to the rest of the audience by controlling myself (unsuccessfully).



4. Argo (Ben Affleck)  Affleck’s three prior features (Hollywoodland, Gone Baby Gone, and The Town) showed competency, even while lacking in sophisticated narrative structures, but Argo is clearly the finest film he’s ever been a part of behind the camera.  The story is compelling because it is constantly shifting between three interesting components: The plight of the hostages in hiding at the Canadian diplomat’s house, the escalating security crisis at the CIA, and the cynical lives of B-list film executives.  Appropriately, the film is full of heart-pulsing action and suspense, tense drama, and biting satire.  Can you think of a more unexpected hybrid of genres?  Not to mention, this film is all based on true declassified events.  There is not a single uninteresting moment in this film as the story is shown with great economy, rising tension, and many surprises.  This is one of many major Hollywood features in the last decade to deal with major crises in the Arab world, but this may be the only one that does it in such a riveting and flat-out entertaining manner.



3. The Kid With a Bike (Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne)  The Dardenne Brothers have never made a bad film (except maybe Lorna’s Silence, which was only OK) and The Kid With a Bike is one of their very best.  The story is, not surprisingly, simple: A 12-year-old boy (with, yes, a bike) is abandoned by his insolvent father, put in an orphanage, and befriended by kindly hairdresser who eventually becomes his guardian of sorts.  He then is tempted into criminal action in spite of his better instincts.  If this sounds like the plot of Oliver Twist, you’re not too far off, since the story also deals with issues of peer pressure, alienation and abandonment, and class divisions.  This is one of those wonderful movies, like last year’s A Separation, which shows straightforward, easily-understood events, but characters whose thoughts and actions are fascinating to read into.  Why does the boy resort to the actions he does?  Why is the woman so deeply drawn to him?  What will happen to these people?  In a lesser film, these might be flaws; in a great film like this, they are blissfully unresolved circumstances left to ponder by engrossed audiences.



2. Zero Dark Thirty (Kathryn Bigelow) Let’s tackle the controversy head on.  First, Republicans have vilified this film because it shows how torture tactics were used to gain intelligence from suspected terrorists (which they say had little direct impact on the Seal Team Six raid), while hunches such as the one Maya has in this film were routinely scoffed at by CIA bureaucracy.  Meanwhile, liberals claim that the film shows how the Obama administration’s anti-torture policies were met with resistance by anti-terrorism units.  Roger Ebert attacked the film (unfairly) as jargon-ridden poor storytelling, while the Academy distanced itself from controversy by not nominating it in several obvious categories (Best Director, Best Cinematography, Best Sound).  All of this is inexplicable.  First of all, the torture scenes are shown as part of the larger reality of interrogation processes that existed in detention camps in the years following 9/11; as Bigelow herself recently told the Los Angeles Times, no one can deny that waterboarding was common, if not routine.  To exclude portraying it would be irresponsible and would make Bin Laden’s capture oversimplistic.  The Obama administration is tacitly criticized in the film, but by its characters, not its filmmakers, and the intent is to open up a wider discourse about how we treat suspected terrorists and what appropriate methods of gathering intelligence should be.  Not only is this masterful cinema, but like all great movies, it begs a meaningful dialogue afterwards.  I don’t know if this is a better or worse movie than The Hurt Locker, but for what it’s worth, Bigelow and Boal are the best filmmaking team working today.



1. The Hunger Games (Gary Ross) Like two years ago when I walked into a theater showing the bastardized American remake of Let the Right One In, I never in a million years would have guessed this movie would top my list of the year’s best films, let alone be mentioned on the list (except maybe a spot on the year’s worst films list).  But the truth is, from its opening moments and through its entire running length, The Hunger Games was the year’s most entertaining, unpredictable, and captivating motion picture.  It was the only 2012 film that, while watching it in a darkened, packed movie theater, made me completely forget about the real world around me.  Forget the fact, for a moment, that the film was based on a popular teen book series; this was a film that had a surprising amount of depth in its treatment of media, culture, and socio-economic divisions.  In an election year where the Right vilified “47 percent” of listless Americans (read: anyone not male, white, affluent, or straight), The Hunger Games’ portrayal of the lower districts’ triumph over the aristocratic elite was uplifting, powerful, and surprisingly relevant in today’s society.   Yes, Elizabeth Banks and Wes Bentley looked ridiculous, but if you can get past that, the story is quite deep.  But the film also worked as terrific entertainment, with Jennifer Lawrence giving the best “girl kicking ass” performance this side of Beatrix Kiddo.  Looking back at the last few years, the films which tend to be number one on my list share one trait: They take themselves seriously.  The Hunger Games could have been a kitschy, over-the-top action satire for teens, but Gary Ross and screenwriter Billy Ray knew this story was more than that, and they made a movie adaptation of the book far better than it deserved to be. 

Thoughts? Disagreements? As long as its not spoilers about Catching Fire, feel free to post below!